The Design Decision That Dictates System Performance & Value
Pressure dependent
Applied using manual dampers
Advantages
- Straightforward, simple design
- Low cost of controls
- Minimum requirement
Disadvantages
- Stability is compromised because the system is pressure dependent. Changes and fluctuations create improper flow rates and pressurization problems. Rebalancing is required at every damper location when changes are made, or fan system performance degrades. The system must be rebalanced frequently.
- Non- linear flow devices
- Low flexibility. Future adjustment is limited
- No inherent monitoring or alarming
- Often not possible to measure flow rates accurately during test and balance
Pressure independent
Applied using venturi air valve
Advantages
- Significant energy savings for owners when integrated with building automation.
- Accurate and stable flow control (within ranges) for variable volume system control
- Eliminates the need for rebalancing – the system is pressure independent and maintains steady flow through system changes, filter loading and HVAC system degradation.
- Opportunity to design in manifold exhaust system for critical spaces e.g., labs, hospitals, and save capital cost. The alternative is individual exhaust assemblies.
- Opportunity to centralise dedicated outdoor air handling units and save capital cost
Disadvantages
- Significant extra capital cost for the contractor compared to a simple manual damper.
“Properly designed feedback control provides safe, efficient, and consistent systems.”
John Penny, QCxP